There are certainly a lot of websites on the market that utilize the word "future" inside their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is preferred often by print publishers and editors that the phrase "future" is an excellent word to used in titles, as it grabs people's attention. But, when people utilize the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I believe they are.
Recently, an editor of the next of things type website asked me to create a column, however in reviewing the website I found it to be underwhelming on the futuristic aspect, and more heavy in to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is intent on "The Future" then why are the articles about new scientific innovations in today's period or happening today? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It seems like they're intent on scientific discovery that's already happened, not what will be in the future. That is just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I believe they could do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to create people think, worried that you will get past an acceptable limit from your own mainstream, quote "core" band of viewers, which I believe they do not even understand.
Needless to say, being an entrepreneur, I understand exactly why they take action this way. It is basically because they wish to generate income and thus sink to less level of readership, while still pretending to talk about the continuing future of stuff. Once the editor wished to defend such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I realize that your website is certainly caused by a news site and I ask what does which have to do with the continuing future of stuff? Shouldn't the website be called NSIN.com or something like this; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is approximately Science News and is a collection of everyone else's news, then it is a copy site of a genre that's already being used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore exactly the same, so even though the articles are written more clearly and easier to comprehend, that will be nice, still what's the value to a "science news junky" as there are hardly any articles on the site compared making use of their competition?
Should they called themselves a news site, then you could have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the near future or they may keep consitently the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a lesson to all or any "Futuristic" type websites as an incident study. For the near future thinkers to your website and have nothing to exhibit them, they will leave. If you utilize trickery to have regular readers there, you are doing an extreme disservice to the continuing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions whilst the be all end all. Either way, it's unethical to utilize this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment